Electrochemical behaviour of ole®ns: oxidation at ruthenium±titanium dioxide and iridium±titanium dioxide coated electrodes

dc.contributor.authorC.L.P.S. ZANTA
dc.contributor.authorA.R. de ANDRADE
dc.contributor.authorJ.F.C. BOODTS2
dc.date.accessioned2012-11-20T12:17:43Z
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-17T14:02:00Z
dc.date.available2012-11-20T12:17:43Z
dc.date.issued2012-11-20
dc.descriptionThe electrocatalytic behaviour of a series of ole®ns was studied on thermally prepared Ti/MO2 and Ti/M0:3Ti0:7O2 electrodes (M = Ru, Ir) in 1.0 M HClO4 in mixed solvent (AN/H2O, 40/60 v/v). The voltammetric investigation was limited to the potential region preceding the OER on these electrodes materials (E < 1:2 V vs SSCE). Aliphatic ole®ns (isophorone and cyclohexene) are inactive while the aromatic ole®ns show a single (safrole) or two (isosafrole) oxidation peaks. The overall catalytic activity of these electrode materials is about the same for both substrates. However, when morphological effects (differences in electrode surface area) are taken into account, normalizing the geometric current density (or faradaic charge) per surface site activity, a slightly better ef®ciency of the active surface sites is observed for Ru-based electrodes when compared to the equivalent Ir-based materials. Partial substitution of the noble metal catalysts by TiO2 results in a synergetic effect depressing the ef®ciency of the active surface sites of the TiO2-stabilized electrocatalysts. The decrease with potential cycling of the substrate oxidation current is attributed to dimeric/polymeric ®lm formation blocking the electrode surface. Re¯ectance and FTIR spectroscopy as well as ohmic resistance data support ®lm formation.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe electrocatalytic behaviour of a series of ole®ns was studied on thermally prepared Ti/MO2 and Ti/M0:3Ti0:7O2 electrodes (M = Ru, Ir) in 1.0 M HClO4 in mixed solvent (AN/H2O, 40/60 v/v). The voltammetric investigation was limited to the potential region preceding the OER on these electrodes materials (E < 1:2 V vs SSCE). Aliphatic ole®ns (isophorone and cyclohexene) are inactive while the aromatic ole®ns show a single (safrole) or two (isosafrole) oxidation peaks. The overall catalytic activity of these electrode materials is about the same for both substrates. However, when morphological effects (differences in electrode surface area) are taken into account, normalizing the geometric current density (or faradaic charge) per surface site activity, a slightly better ef®ciency of the active surface sites is observed for Ru-based electrodes when compared to the equivalent Ir-based materials. Partial substitution of the noble metal catalysts by TiO2 results in a synergetic effect depressing the ef®ciency of the active surface sites of the TiO2-stabilized electrocatalysts. The decrease with potential cycling of the substrate oxidation current is attributed to dimeric/polymeric ®lm formation blocking the electrode surface. Re¯ectance and FTIR spectroscopy as well as ohmic resistance data support ®lm formation.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://dl.ftveti.edu.et/handle/123456789/4207
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectcatalytic activity, iridium dioxide, ole®ns, oxide electrodes, ruthenium dioxideen_US
dc.titleElectrochemical behaviour of ole®ns: oxidation at ruthenium±titanium dioxide and iridium±titanium dioxide coated electrodesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
505759 (210).pdf
Size:
159.54 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format